Covid 19: Complexity, uncertainty and communication – Opportunities for education and training

Introduction Covid-19 not managed with equal dexterity globally. Some recognised the challenges at an earlier stage than others. A pandemic – example of a complex problem. Complex problems – multiple interacting factors, many unidentified and, or unmeasurable, embody considerable uncertainty and unpredictable outcomes. Failure to appreciate complexity – unsatisfactory, simplistic solutions, repetition of errors and loss of public trust. Additionally, important concepts required to understand the pandemic were not appreciated, not only by the public, but also by politicians and the media, one example is that of the exponential. This leads to public misconceptions and further erosion of trust. The key challenges, their consequences and subsequent opportunities relate to three broad areas and their interrelationships: Background • Key Challenges: o Complex problems: § Multiple factors interact in a non- linear, non-hierarchical manner, no simple chain of causality. § Small changes to a single factor – unexpected but significant changes in outcomes. § Initial challenge – identify and accept that a situation is complex. o Uncertainty: § Hallmark of complexity. § Discomfort with uncertainty, Bertrand Russell – ‘The demand for certainty is one which is natural to man, but is nevertheless an intellectual vice’… o Communication: § Communicating these concepts and associated risk between super-specialists, policy makers and the public. • Consequences: o Complexity: § Delay in identifying and accepting complexity – the journalist, H. L. Mencken pithily remarked …‘For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong’… § Essential – obsessively trawl and evaluate breadth of information. E.g. experience with SARS and MERS offered important clues. § Input from super-specialists – invaluable but characterised by siloed assumptions, method, and language. § Multiple potential interpretations of data – choose the least wrong. § Requires constant reappraisal of accumulating evidence and iterations of strategy. § ‘Science’ merely illuminates, it does not lead and cannot be followed. o Uncertainty: § ‘Common sense’ – simplistic solutions e.g., handwashing for what was always likely to be, principally, a respiratory transmitted virus. § Repetition of mistakes, Einstein – …’The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results’. § Range of potential ‘solutions’ – decision-makers to choose between ‘apples and pears’ …the least bad option. o Communication: § Lack of certainty and apparent indecision can give the impression of incompetence. § Loss of trust. • Opportunities: o Education: § Review the entire educational system. § Propose breadth and critical thinking component throughout. o Training – Government, public bodies, and media: § Identification and management of complex problems and uncertainty. § Approach – obsessive evidence trawl § Cycle of review of evidence and strategy. § Overview of super-specialists • Problem-solving styles and cognitive bias. § Communication. o Application of approach to other complex issues could include. § E.g. Public health and social care. § The future of town centres. Proposal • Broad Aims of Education and Training projects: o Equip super-specialists, politicians, the civil service, the media, and the public with a framework for understanding. o Develop and pilot educational and training materials: • Broad Objectives o Review o Review education and training programs in a variety of contexts internationally. o Design o Flexible framework to apply in different contexts. o Content e.g.: o Complexity o Definition o Features o Uncertainty o Probability o Risk o Problem solving o Critical thinking o Strategies o Problem solving styles and cognitive bias. o Reflection o Maintaining of an open mind. o Decision making o Apples and pears – the importance of values i.e., models, algorithms and science illuminate but do not instruct. o Least bad option o Communication o Skills and strategies. o Importance of trust o Pilot o Assess o Implement o Cycle of review • Education: o Specific Educational Aims: o Broader educational approach applicable to the challenges of the 3rd and 4th decades of the 21st century. o Flexible system-wide framework. o Specific Education Objectives: o Review o Review – education systems internationally including e.g., philosophy teaching in France and Problem Based Learning in medicine. o Approach o Critical thinking o Content – different educational contexts, ages, and abilities: o Complexity o Complex problems – qualitatively different to the laws and formulas of school science. o Uncertainty o Probability and risk. o Problem solving o Critical thinking o Exploring assumptions o Reflective thought o Science: o Perspectives, theories, and models § Theories compared to and contrasted with conspiracy theories. o Concepts: § Clarify and separate out relevant concepts – some are best represented by a Venn diagram. o Evidence: § What counts as evidence and knowledge? § Evidence compared to and contrasted with internet gossip. o Limitations to science and modelling: § Science compared to and contrasted with technology. o Science and social science § Science embedded in social context. o Decisions o Values. o Least bad option. o Major challenges: o Developing content suitable for age groups and abilities. Training – Government, Public bodies, and Media: o Specific Training Aims to: o Flexible program – identification and management of complex problems, uncertainty, and communication. o Specific Training Objectives: o Review – training in varied contexts internationally e.g., healthcare, business, and military o Content e.g.: o Complexity: o Identification and management. o Problem solving: o Silo thinking – super-specialist input vital but overview essential. Sir Alex Ferguson coached from the stand where he could view the whole pitch. o Explore assumptions and biases but do not reinvent the wheel. o Quality publications on SARS and MERS offered invaluable clues to the likely behaviour of covid-19. Evidence from abroad was initially treated with suspicion. o Ongoing reappraisal of evidence and strategy. o Communication o The value of trust. o Communication – between super-specialists, policy makers and the public. o Challenges: o Significant undertaking. o Do not design a framework to solve yesterday’s problem. Summary • Pandemic – highlighted challenges in identifying and managing complex problems and uncertainty. • Significant opportunities: o Review of the education system and problem-solving training within government, public bodies and beyond.

 

 

2243-11

Leave a Reply

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading